This End Down

The origin of evangelistic culture
We start with the two great commands that form the foundation of Christianity’s purpose: “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you” (Matthew 28:19-20a) and “Love the LORD your God with all your heart, mind, soul and strength, and love your neighbor as yourself.” (Mark 12:28-31 pp).

Out of these commands, you find a Christian culture devoted to evangelism, obedience to Jesus’ teachings, love for the LORD, and love for other people. However, the American Protestant church is dominated by Evangelicalism, which (as the name implies) places priority on evangelism. This emphasis isn’t unfounded;  consider the importance Jesus placed on people being brought to know his father, the example of evangelism set by the earlier church, and the implications of someone’s death without knowing the LORD. The result is that I, like many of my generation, was raised seeing the primary goal of Christians as soul-saving.

Do you really love me, or are you just fulfilling your quota?
What I didn’t understand as a younger Christian is that evangelism is important in the context of the other commands. Many of us American evangelicals have forgotten the second half of “Love God, Love People” when we are following the Great Commission, which is why (among other reasons, I’m sure) Evangelicals have earned such a bad name in American culture. We yell and scream at the “sinners” because they “need to repent from their evil ways”–all true and Biblically supported, of course, and all in the name of love (“I don’t want to see them go to Hell!”)–but really practiced without any love at all. There’s no mention that we the preachers are also sinners; there’s no compassion, empathy, or even stopping to learn someone’s name.

In response to our bad name, a common sermon thread has emerged: “Don’t tell the non-Christians to come to us; let’s go to them!” It’s a great thought, recognizing that while Jesus went to the houses of the tax collectors, we’ve instead been sitting in our temples telling the “tax collectors” of our day that they’re not good enough to even come to our temples. What’s this meant for a lot of my generation, however, is that instead of just sitting in church in a Christian bubble, we instead push outward on our bubble and try to sort of just crush everyone else’s bubbles underneath ours. Instead of just sitting around at youth group, the youth group now goes out on campus and does cold contact evangelism (walking up to perfect strangers and asking/telling them about Jesus.)

Now, there’s nothing wrong with contact evangelism or street preaching. There are certainly times when the LORD prompts you to speak to someone you don’t know, and some people find that that’s a regular enough part of their lives (or feel like it should be) that contact evangelism, street preaching, and the like are where they best connect to people about Jesus. That’s fine. But there’s a much more foundational element of the Great Commission that we’re often missing.

If you’re an evangelical Christian, consider this: how many of your close friends aren’t Christian? Did you make any friends in your classes or at your job? Did you join any non-Christian clubs? Are you involved in any non-church social activities? Or is your entire circle of influence formed of Christians? My bet is that we’ll find that we’re a lot more immersed in Christian culture than we realize. Evangelism must be “talking about Jesus to a random stranger on the bus” because they’re the only non-Christians we ever see–hence our cold contact evangelism mentality.

To be “in this world but not of it”, we have to actually be in the world
What if there were a different way? What if, instead of just sitting on the outside of popular culture, and (in the words of Andy Crouch) condemning, critiquing, consuming, and copying it, we actually engaged with the world around us? What if we were around non-Christians, joined non-Christian groups, intentionally made friends with people who disagreed with us or don’t understand us?

My wife Tereva has always been frustrated with one aspect of the culture of our InterVarsity chapter: it is often the only campus group its members are connected to. People join our chapter and love the fellowship, community, teaching, and even the outreach, and they are content just to stay there. Rather, Tereva wants them to join other campus groups, get to know other people, go do extracurricular activities you love and make friends there. My intial response was to wonder why we wanted to encourage people to spend less time with our group, but I soon saw that even our “outreach” events were merely just us trying to expand the edges of our little bubble of IV culture.

My challenge to us
I always feel a disconnect when people are so super-hyper about evangelism and church culture but seem to know nothing about the people they claim to want to reach. There’s a definite need for all of us to realize that Jesus didn’t just talk about the Kingdom–he talked to people where they were. Talking to shepherds, he used sheep metaphors. In a religious culture that didn’t allow mingling with sinners, he sat and ate with sinners. When speaking to untouchable lepers, he reached out and put his hand on them while he spoke. In the same way also, meeting people where they are doesn’t just mean going with a group of Christian friends in Christian t-shirts and quoting small snippets of Biblical phrases that mean something to you and nothing to the person you’re talking about. It means getting into their culture, their situation, and putting yourself in places where you can learn from them before you start pushing your culture on them.

However, I’m not the only one who feels that disconnect with those church culture folks. I think I share that with a lot of the postmodern church, a lot of people my age who are the “intellectuals” and “cool Christians”–we’re proud of ourselves for actually knowing non-Christians and being able to engage in their spheres. Some marks of “cool Christianity” are embracing the freedoms that Christ very legitimately offers us, but valuing those freedoms over the call to ministry; when more of your discussions about Jesus are about how silly and legalistic the “church culture” people are, and less are about the person of Jesus and his call on your life.

My opinion is that John Kerry lost the ‘04 presidential race because he didn’t actually have a platform to run on. His entire campaign was “at least I’m not George Bush,” and while it got him a lot of press, it wasn’t enough to actually convince people he had anything to offer. In the same way, “cool Christians,” we need to be more than just “the Christians that aren’t stuck in church culture.” Yes, it’s great that Jesus has given us freedom, and yes, I support the Biblical right to drink (in moderation), cuss (occasionally, but be careful with your heart and don’t bring your brother down just for your freedom), and to watch secular movies and listen to secular music. The freedom of the LORD and his desire for us to enjoy the world around us are very important; showing non-Christians that we’re not inviting them into a life of service to church, but instead a joy-filled life serving the King of the Universe is important. However, our lives need to be most devoted to the above-mentioned foundations of the true Church that obeys our King: evangelism, obedience to Jesus’ teachings, and love for God and others.

How can I be cool and still love Jesus?
Simple answer: You can’t. But what we can do is recognize that our lives should not be lived in church culture, and our lives should not be lived as a contrast to church culture. Rather, our lives should be lived devoted to Jesus, and we should recognize that different people will go about it different ways. Church culture folks need to learn a little bit from cool Christians about loving and understanding the people you’re called to reach; cool Christians need to learn a little bit from Church culture folks about devoting your entire being and existence to the work of the LORD without hesitation, shame or regret. Both sides need to step outside of their comfort zone and become a little more like the other side. Both sides need to stop judging the other.

I know this was fantastically long, and I hope it meant something. Thanks for reading it, and I’d love your comments, criticism, and suggestions.

I wish I could say I have a well-researched, Biblically-based opinion here. I don’t. I’ve just thought about this some times and want to have a discussion with some people. I don’t have all of the answers–in fact, I have far more questions in this area than I have answers. I also don’t want to repeat my experience of starting huge, divisive comment flame wars. So, as a preface: if any discussion happens and if it starts getting heated, I will just shut off the comments and delete any heated comments. That having been said, here’s my thought:

I’m trying to figure out what I think about professional worship musicianship (the title/position/cultural entity, not them as people). There are a lot of things involved in this discussion and a lot of things that affect how I can look at the discussion. Here are a few.

• I’m a full-time employee of InterVarsity Christian Fellowship, a Christian campus ministry. I’m essentially paid (although, since I fund-raise, it’s a little more complicated than that) so that I can do all day the type of ministry that all Christians are called to, but have less time to do because of their full-time jobs.
• I love the worship leader at my church, Steve Adams. I don’t think he should be asked to do the work he does without being compensated.
• I believe someone could make the point according to Biblical precedent that no one should be “paid to minister” (the term “professional ministers” comes up often in these discussions). However, I believe that these sorts of arguments–at least, in the context of what I’m discussing here–forget that there’s also no Biblical precedent for “churches” like we have today, so unless you’re a part of a house church type movement, I’m not sure if I think this argument holds a lot of weight. Also, there was this guy in the Bible named Paul who set a little bit of a precedent here.
• I regularly enjoy the music recorded and written by professional musicians. I’m currently listening to music from Eddie James, and have benefitted greatly by the ministry of many modern Christian worship leaders/musicians–among others, Jason Upton and Fred Hammond.
• I make a distinction here between Christian musicians and Christian Worship musicians. I know that all Christian music can be called worship; however, a musician who is a full time musician who is a Christian is, in my eyes, different than a full-time worship leader/musician. Derek Webb writes desperately God-focused music, and while his music reflects more strongly a deep relationship with God than many mainstream worship leaders, I consider him a Christian musician, not a worship leader. Tell me if you think I’m wrong. I’d love to think more on this topic.
• I recognize that the previous point is debatable, as I have a somewhat tenuous distinction between the two. I have a very arbitrary distinction in my mind that is definitely a stretch and which I recognize as incomplete: I feel like Derek Webb and his compatriots (for an extreme, see Pedro the Lion’s David Bazan) have the freedom to have whatever relationship with God they have. They can have good days and bad days, they can question God and their faith, and they can show themselves as regular people. I don’t feel like worship leaders are given the same allowance to be human.
• Compelled to feel joyful: I would venture that every Christian, at one point in their lives, has sat in a Christian gathering while everyone else smilingly sang “You Give Me Joy” or another such song, and thought, “I have no joy! I’m such a hypocrite for singing this!” I would urge them to sing anyway, and see how God moves in their hearts. As a worship musician, I have a similar experience–yet it’s so much easier for me to sit and play the bass lines to “You Give Me Joy” without engaging at all in the lyrical/spiritual content of the song. This is definitely a danger.
• I recognize the value of smiling if you’re on stage at church. I also hate being told to smile, and cannot force myself to do so if someone’s required me to.
• I feel something of a weight when I’m in a church full of people dancing, jumping, and singing. On the one hand, I’m so happy that God means so much to people. On the other hand, I can’t say that I can confidently claim that the church is bringing that sort of joy out into the world. Yes! Given one or the other, I’d prefer people be joyful and passionate when they’re intentionally in fellowship and in God’s presence. But I feel like we can have both.
• Local versus Traveling: I also struggle some with the concept of the traveling worship musician. I spent much of my middle school and high school free time as a part of a very charismatic, spirit-filled group of worshippers who loved spending time in a literal upper room praying and singing and crying out, but who never (to my memory) helped a single poor person or saw anyone come to Christ. That same “worship culture”, for a desperate lack of a better word, is present in a lot of groups that jump and hoot and holler when their favorite worship musician comes into town, and they all have a big emotional Jesus fest, and then they go back home and do nothing. I’m not saying that anyone who goes to Christian concerts is bad! I’m saying that I worry that traveling musicians may feed into the subculture of Christian “worshippers” who are passionate at church and unengaged outside of church. Where local musicians/worship leaders are members of the congregations they minister to/with, traveling musicians don’t have the same connection. Again! I listen to worship CDs, I listen to other church’s podcasts, and I’ve been to plenty a worship concert in my day. I’m just somewhat troubled by the entire mindset of the traveling worship musician, and I’m struggling to find out why–and completely open to the conclusion that it’s just my personal issue.
• I may add more here. I feel like it’s a broader issue, but all this typing has made me forget all of my original thoughts about it.

The pastor of my local church body, Mike Patz, said something recently that I really appreciate. The gist was this: “I was thinking about watching Religulous [(a movie critical of religious people)]. Then I realized, I can criticize the church plenty on my own. I don’t need someone else to help me with it.”

In the same way, the last thing I want is for this to be a complaint session about the modern church. I’m sick and tired of “enlightened” Christians in my generation sitting around and complaining. Instead, I’m trying to develop a right theology so that I can be a part of bringing the church closer to Jesus, and would really love some people with more wisdom than me to share their insight into the areas of my confusion.

NOTES (added later)

• My friend Jeff asked “What’s a professional worship musician,” and then “What’s a worship musician?” This prompted me to think about what exactly makes one a worship musician–considering that “worship” certainly means more than music. Could part of my problem be a feeling that one can be a church/Christian event musician without being a true worshipper? I don’t know, but I definitely think that’s very close to the heart of the issue–at what point is there so much structure in something that it allows someone to “participate” in it without actually getting the point? Maybe it ties into my early  dislike for all things rigid and traditional.

I love people-watching and eavesdropping on loud public conversations. One going on right next to me:

“If you’re desiring Jesus, you’re already saved–the prayer is not only not necessary, it actually starts you off on crutches, thinking you can rely on your own ability and understanding to connect to God.”

Thoughts? If you’re still there–I know it’s been a good 2 months.

Someone (who was quite rich) once told me that the “Eye of the Needle” was a gate in ancient Jerusalem that was short, so camels had to bend over to get through it, making it possible but difficult. I hadn’t really thought about it since then, but a few weeks ago I heard someone mentioning that rumor as a total fallacy. So, since I just read Luke 18 today, I figured I’d look it up. Maybe I’d do some great scholarship, and write a long post on it.

However, once again, Wikipedia has done that for me. I’d love to hear if anyone has convincing arguments otherwise, but this general interpretation section, especially in light of the Talmud section and the greater scope of the Christian narrative, seems to be pretty right on. I really appreciate the two sides of the issue–both that you cannot serve both God and mammon and that, if wealth is a sign of God’s reward, at least in Old Covenant thought, then no one can enter the Kingdom of Heaven–without God.

There are Christians who have hysterical reactions,
    as if the world would have slipped out of God’s hands.
They act violently as if they were risking everything.

But we believe in history;
the world is not a roll of the dice going toward chaos.
A new world has begun to happen since Christ has risen…

Jesus Christ, we rejoice in your definitive triumph…
    with our bodies still in the breach
    and our souls in tension,
    we cry out our first “Hurrah!”
    till eternity unfolds itself.

Your sorrow now has passed.
Your enemies have failed.
You are a definitive smile for humankind.

What matter the wait now for us?
We accept the struggle and the death;
because you, our love, will not die!

We march behind you,
    on the road to the future.
You are with us
    and you are our immortality!

Take away the sadness from our faces.
We are not in a game of chance…
    You have the last word!

Beyond the crushing of our bones,
    now has begun the eternal “alleluia!”
From the thousand openings of our wounded bodies
    and souls there arises now a triumphal song!

So, teach us to give voice to your new life throughout all the world.
Because you dry the tears from the eyes of the oppressed forever…
    and death will disappear…

–Jesuit Father Luis Espinal was assassinated March 22, 1980, in La Paz, Bolivia, by paramilitary forces. He wrote this meditation shortly before his death.

The God who made the world and everything in it is the Lord of heaven and earth and does not live in temples built by hands. And he is not served by human hands, as if he needed anything. Rather, he himself gives everyone life and breath and everything else. From one man he made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands. God did this so that they would seek him and perhaps reach out for him and find him, though he is not far from any one of us. “For in him we live and move and have our being.” As some of your own poets have said, “We are his offspring.”

Therefore since we are God’s offspring, we should not think that the divine being is like gold or silver or stone–an image made by human design and skill. In the past God overlooked such ignorance, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent. For he has set a day when he will judge the world with justice by the man he has appointed. He has given proof of this to everyone by raising him from the dead.