Migrating InterVarsityuf.org to Facebook?
June 17th, 2009
I’ve been keeping up http://intervarsityuf.org/ for the last few years. It runs on a proprietary PHP/MySQL Content Management System I wrote specifically for the site (called CampusPress, but I wrote and named it before I’d heard of WordPress–I promise.) It’s essentially an underpowered version of some of the simplest posting and paging features of Wordpress, and were I to start again I’d just install Wordpress.
The problem is, not a lot of people (as far as I can tell) actually use the site. People often find us through the site, but it’s seldom that I hear a student talking about their use of the site or discovering something new through the site. It’s a pain to remember to update it, since we can do Notes and Events in Facebook, and getting students whose lives revolve around Facebook to regularly use an external web site is ridiculous. What intrinsic motivation do they have to regular visit the site? Nothing. And few to none of them use RSS readers, so that does nothing.
On the other hand, the Facebook group
- Allows us to create events with RSVPs and photo galleries
- Allows students to invite friends to events and discuss rides/etc
- Gives me a convenient way to message everyone (we have a Listserv on the web site, but e-mailing students is almost worthless these days–if you want a response, send a facebook message)
- Requires no backend programming or updates
- Is free
Finally, Facebook pages are even more powerful than groups:
- They allow your page to be visible to non-facebook-users (increasing outside visibility)
- They make your group an actual facebook entity, meaning you can use the Publisher–release status updates, write/import Notes, post links, photos, and videos–and these updates show up in your students’ feeds
- Using a new feature called Insights, you can track your visits and the popularity of certain aspects of your page
- There’s much more possibility for customization, allowing you to add tabs and customize your site design and programming using FBML (Facebook’s version of HTML)
So, I’ve created the InterVarsity Christian Fellowship at UF InterVarsity Christian Fellowship – UF Undergrad page I realized after I created it that I should’ve named it “InterVarsity Undergrad at UF”, so I hope that doesn’t come back to haunt me when Greek (and Grad?) chapters want their own pages. I’m trying to figure out if I should start a new page now, before I invite people, or try to learn how to change it.
Once I learn how to change the name or just start a new one (or just stick with this name), I’ll put up more information about how everything’s working out in the transition. I tagged this with “facebookpage“, and hopefully I’ll remember to do the same in the future.
OMGZORS ITS RICKES BIRTHDAY TODAY
June 3rd, 2009
Google Wave Video Outline
May 30th, 2009
After watching this video (via Lifehacker) from the initial Google Wave presentation, it makes a lot of sense. However, it’s a darn long video, so I took some outline-form notes for anyone who doesn’t want to sit through the whole thing.
Here’s the video: http://bit.ly/2ubKlY
And here’s the outline:
- Wave vs. e-mail
- E-mail is like snail mail. Each “e-mail” is sent to a person.
- Wave is like a “conversation”–GMail’s thread view was a precursor. Every wave is a shared object hosted somewhere. When each viewer looks at the wave, they can leave their replies, and then the next user to see the Wave can see the original, the comments, and then add their own… more like bulletin boards.
- Usage scenarios
- Responding when the other person is offline (more like traditional e-mail)
- You can reply to particular pieces of a wave (e.g. a question asked mid-message), rather than just one big reply to the entire wave. Each reply to each piece looks a little more like a comment on that section of the wave, rather than a full response.
- Each of these comments can turn into a thread, where other people reply to your reply.
- Responding when the other person is online:
- It actually turns into a character-by-character chat. IM merged with e-mail.
- Adding a new person to the wave
- With e-mail, you would forward the whole chain of messages and replies to the new person. With Wave, you just invite them and they can view everything–not just whatever was forwarded to them. Also, if someone goes back to a previous message in the thread to forward it, reply to it, or make changes to it, the new person can’t be accidentally left off the delivery list.
- The person can see the original message and then click step-by-step through each comment, etc. using the “Playback” feature.
- There is also always the option for a “private reply” to a particular person which everyone else can’t see.
- Attachments
- Drag & Drop pictures into the wave: adds thumbnails to everyone else’s screen long before the pictures are done uploading
- Can instantly turn the entire wave into a group photo album with a beautiful “slideshow” feature
- Very easy to extract all/some images from a wave and creating a new wave with them
- Responding when the other person is offline (more like traditional e-mail)
- Embeddable
- Like Maps, which can be embedded into an existing web page, waves can also be embedded
- “Gadgets” that are connected to a particular web site show up as a “Participant” you can invite to view that wave, which instantly shares that wave to the web site
- And! The entire wave–the ability to respond to it, etc. are posted to your site. So comments on the web site are shared back to the wave, and responses to the wave are shared back to the web site: LIVE.
- Any blog you comment on shows up in your wave client; this way, following threads on blogs you like can all be pulled into your Wave client.
- Social Networks
- You can create a new wave as a post in your favorite social network, and share it with friends who aren’t even Wave users (as long as they’re on that social network), where they can use all of the features of Wave
- You can create a new wave as a post in your favorite social network, and share it with friends who aren’t even Wave users (as long as they’re on that social network), where they can use all of the features of Wave
- Only one version of the wave exists
- So even if you’ve posted it anywhere else, those other embeds (your blog, social network, etc.), will instantly reflect any edits from anywhere else
- Collaborative Authoring (using Edit Button)
- After taking notes, do you put in a doc or a wiki, or e-mail them out?
- With Wave, you can do both. Real-time collab like Google Docs
- Every time you visit the wave, you see the current version with anything that’s changed highlighted for you to review. Remember, you can step through the whole thing edit by edit using “Playback”.
- It’s all still a wave–but if you choose to think of the original as “document-like”, you can edit it.
- Example: You could choose to fix someone’s spelling errors on an e-mail.
- Can at any point export the current version of the wave to a new wave, text document, etc.
- But, you can still make changes to the original and repost to the new wave
- Different teams can be working on different sections of the original and at any point publish just their part of the output/exported wave
- After taking notes, do you put in a doc or a wiki, or e-mail them out?
- Organization
- Folders
- Saved Searches
- Tags
- Shared by everyone (if you tag it, everyone else gets the same tag)
- Shared by everyone (if you tag it, everyone else gets the same tag)
- Use waves to organize other waves
- You can make waves with lists of links to other waves, etc.
- Easy to do! Just pick up a wave from the search panel and drop it into your new links wave
- Point to one wave in another, like a wiki
- Productivity examples
- Scheduling a movie with friends
- Polls on what movie to see (Yes/No/Maybe gadget lets everyone easily clicky each)
- Scheduling a movie with friends
- Extensions
- Extensions can live inside of a wave: just click install button from that wave
- Bloggy
- One they’ve written already. Auto posts the wave to the blog
- One they’ve written already. Auto posts the wave to the blog
- Games!
- Collaborative or competitive
- Chess
- Sudoku
- You can use “playback” to watch the entire game!
- Collaborative or competitive
- Maps
- Maps embed easily in a wave and update easily (other people can watch you zoom in and out, switch to satellite, etc. in the wave)
- You can add markers to the maps
- Draw on maps with polygon tool
- Maps embed easily in a wave and update easily (other people can watch you zoom in and out, switch to satellite, etc. in the wave)
- Spell check (Spelly)
- Checks not just against a dictionary, but also against a huge language database.
- “Can I have some been soup” knows that it’s wrong. “You are to kind” knows that it’s wrong
- Checks not just against a dictionary, but also against a huge language database.
- Link detector (Linky)
- live updating: Most things, when they detect a link, convert it to a permanent link. Instead, linky suggests and then unsuggests as you keep typing
- Videos: embeds the youtube, etc. video straight into the wave (can everyone watch it together? maybe?)
- live updating: Most things, when they detect a link, convert it to a permanent link. Instead, linky suggests and then unsuggests as you keep typing
- Search while within Wave to find links (Searchy)
- Popup a small google search window and get images or links from Google; it puts the link or image straight into the wave
- Twitter
- “Twave” is a wave of tweets
- Signin to your twitter account in that wave
- That wave shows your twitter feed (tweets from everyone else, so just like the twitter.com feed)
- You can respond to twitter posts in wave, and it actually tweets your response
- You can make a new twave that includes all of the results with a certain search result
- Use Wave API to use Waves in existing workflows (Buggy)
- Connects with issue trackers: githost, bugtracker, etc.
- Auto-translation (Rosy)
- character-by-character live translation! AH!
Fancy Features
- Live update
- Search results update very, very quickly (less than a second)
- Polls (Polly)
- Put forms in waves: sends out a new question wave to each person, which report back to the admin wave
- You can create forms collaboratively
- Auto-generates a results section in the admin wave
- Federation
- Even though Waves can be on different servers, it’s just as quick/live across two different servers (i.e. lots of people will be on Google’s Wave server, but some people will be on their own company’s Wave server: it’ll still work fine)
- Even though public portions of the wave are shared between servers, private replies don’t ever leave your server
- Even though Waves can be on different servers, it’s just as quick/live across two different servers (i.e. lots of people will be on Google’s Wave server, but some people will be on their own company’s Wave server: it’ll still work fine)
- Responds really well to upping font sizes, resizing certain sections, etc. (doesn’t feel so much like a web app, more like an actual app)
My Concerns
- Bringing all of your online communications into one inbox could get very cluttered–Inbox Zero is hard enough as it is
Dorky quotes (presenters are apparently Firefly fans) ![]()
- Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal (Firefly)
- “Shiny” (Firefly)
- Initech (Office Space)
All grown up now
May 15th, 2009
Tonight, as I brushed my teeth and walked around the house to close up for the night, something a student told me last week at Chapter Camp took hold of me: I am a grown up.
This sank in because I had just left the bedroom where my wife slept in our bed (not the cheap college mattress, mind you, but a real bed with a frame underneath it) in front of our TV (not the 15″ one you inherit from your old roommate, but a real brand new TV). I was looking down at the full-sized bathroom that I share with my wife (not my roommates), at my hands complete with wedding band, and thinking about the house we’re hoping to rent for next year.
As I wandered out into the living room to check the thermostat, I thought about the electric bills I care for, the health insurance documents on the kitchen counter, and the cars we have to keep in repair.
Somewhere between the bathroom and the living room it kicked me in the gut: I am an adult. I am a grown man. I am 24 years old, have a facial piercing, and on most days I wear Nike sneakers, jeans, and a t-shirt, so you could most certainly call me an immature adult. But let’s face it: I have a wife, a job, a car, and we have our own place, furniture, and plans. I am, in the ways it is recognized and quantified in American society (or at least in my head back when I was a young pup), a grown-up.
You know what? It doesn’t feel as different as I had expected. I like it, that’s for sure. But I don’t feel much different than 5-year old Matt. I’m even beginning to lean a little toward Matthew, my childhood name.
The reason I put the qualifiers in front of “a grown-up” is that I’m not entirely sure that any of these accomplishments are necessarily tied to my spiritual growth and maturity. It’s interesting to claim myself a grown-up and yet feel so childlike so often. I hope that some aspect of that childlike nature will never go away, but I really do wonder if at some point I’ll feel more grown up. What does it take? A mortgage? Kids, perhaps? I already have a grey hair, for whatever that’s worth.
Praise the Lord for doing what he has in me to bring me to the point where I can love and respect my wife without too often falling into self-centered tantrums. Praise him for parents who taught me responsibility early on to help me survive moving halfway across the country for school. Praise him for a fellowship that nurtured and encouraged me to grow up in the way I look at people different from me. Praise him for my partner in this new part of my life.
Professional Worship Musicians
April 13th, 2009
I wish I could say I have a well-researched, Biblically-based opinion here. I don’t. I’ve just thought about this some times and want to have a discussion with some people. I don’t have all of the answers–in fact, I have far more questions in this area than I have answers. I also don’t want to repeat my experience of starting huge, divisive comment flame wars. So, as a preface: if any discussion happens and if it starts getting heated, I will just shut off the comments and delete any heated comments. That having been said, here’s my thought:
I’m trying to figure out what I think about professional worship musicianship (the title/position/cultural entity, not them as people). There are a lot of things involved in this discussion and a lot of things that affect how I can look at the discussion. Here are a few.
- I’m a full-time employee of InterVarsity Christian Fellowship, a Christian campus ministry. I’m essentially paid (although, since I fund-raise, it’s a little more complicated than that) so that I can do all day the type of ministry that all Christians are called to, but have less time to do because of their full-time jobs.
- I love the worship leader at my church, Steve Adams. I don’t think he should be asked to do the work he does without being compensated.
- I believe someone could make the point according to Biblical precedent that no one should be “paid to minister” (the term “professional ministers” comes up often in these discussions). However, I believe that these sorts of arguments–at least, in the context of what I’m discussing here–forget that there’s also no Biblical precedent for “churches” like we have today, so unless you’re a part of a house church type movement, I’m not sure if I think this argument holds a lot of weight. Also, there was this guy in the Bible named Paul who set a little bit of a precedent here.
- I regularly enjoy the music recorded and written by professional musicians. I’m currently listening to music from Eddie James, and have benefitted greatly by the ministry of many modern Christian worship leaders/musicians–among others, Jason Upton and Fred Hammond.
- I make a distinction here between Christian musicians and Christian Worship musicians. I know that all Christian music can be called worship; however, a musician who is a full time musician who is a Christian is, in my eyes, different than a full-time worship leader/musician. Derek Webb writes desperately God-focused music, and while his music reflects more strongly a deep relationship with God than many mainstream worship leaders, I consider him a Christian musician, not a worship leader. Tell me if you think I’m wrong. I’d love to think more on this topic.
- I recognize that the previous point is debatable, as I have a somewhat tenuous distinction between the two. I have a very arbitrary distinction in my mind that is definitely a stretch and which I recognize as incomplete: I feel like Derek Webb and his compatriots (for an extreme, see Pedro the Lion’s David Bazan) have the freedom to have whatever relationship with God they have. They can have good days and bad days, they can question God and their faith, and they can show themselves as regular people. I don’t feel like worship leaders are given the same allowance to be human.
- Compelled to feel joyful: I would venture that every Christian, at one point in their lives, has sat in a Christian gathering while everyone else smilingly sang “You Give Me Joy” or another such song, and thought, “I have no joy! I’m such a hypocrite for singing this!” I would urge them to sing anyway, and see how God moves in their hearts. As a worship musician, I have a similar experience–yet it’s so much easier for me to sit and play the bass lines to “You Give Me Joy” without engaging at all in the lyrical/spiritual content of the song. This is definitely a danger.
- I recognize the value of smiling if you’re on stage at church. I also hate being told to smile, and cannot force myself to do so if someone’s required me to.
- I feel something of a weight when I’m in a church full of people dancing, jumping, and singing. On the one hand, I’m so happy that God means so much to people. On the other hand, I can’t say that I can confidently claim that the church is bringing that sort of joy out into the world. Yes! Given one or the other, I’d prefer people be joyful and passionate when they’re intentionally in fellowship and in God’s presence. But I feel like we can have both.
- Local versus Traveling: I also struggle some with the concept of the traveling worship musician. I spent much of my middle school and high school free time as a part of a very charismatic, spirit-filled group of worshippers who loved spending time in a literal upper room praying and singing and crying out, but who never (to my memory) helped a single poor person or saw anyone come to Christ. That same “worship culture”, for a desperate lack of a better word, is present in a lot of groups that jump and hoot and holler when their favorite worship musician comes into town, and they all have a big emotional Jesus fest, and then they go back home and do nothing. I’m not saying that anyone who goes to Christian concerts is bad! I’m saying that I worry that traveling musicians may feed into the subculture of Christian “worshippers” who are passionate at church and unengaged outside of church. Where local musicians/worship leaders are members of the congregations they minister to/with, traveling musicians don’t have the same connection. Again! I listen to worship CDs, I listen to other church’s podcasts, and I’ve been to plenty a worship concert in my day. I’m just somewhat troubled by the entire mindset of the traveling worship musician, and I’m struggling to find out why–and completely open to the conclusion that it’s just my personal issue.
- I may add more here. I feel like it’s a broader issue, but all this typing has made me forget all of my original thoughts about it.
The pastor of my local church body, Mike Patz, said something recently that I really appreciate. The gist was this: “I was thinking about watching Religulous [(a movie critical of religious people)]. Then I realized, I can criticize the church plenty on my own. I don’t need someone else to help me with it.”
In the same way, the last thing I want is for this to be a complaint session about the modern church. I’m sick and tired of “enlightened” Christians in my generation sitting around and complaining. Instead, I’m trying to develop a right theology so that I can be a part of bringing the church closer to Jesus, and would really love some people with more wisdom than me to share their insight into the areas of my confusion.
NOTES (added later)
- My friend Jeff asked “What’s a professional worship musician,” and then “What’s a worship musician?” This prompted me to think about what exactly makes one a worship musician–considering that “worship” certainly means more than music. Could part of my problem be a feeling that one can be a church/Christian event musician without being a true worshipper? I don’t know, but I definitely think that’s very close to the heart of the issue–at what point is there so much structure in something that it allows someone to “participate” in it without actually getting the point? Maybe it ties into my early dislike for all things rigid and traditional.
Mawwiage… is what bwings us togevuw today
March 17th, 2009
I’m getting married Saturday.
We even set up a blog for it… which we then proceeded to forget about.
Our families are coming into town Wednesday, Thursday, and Friday.
We still have a lot to do before the big day. Today we’ll be finalizing wedding cake details, possibly shopping for some gifts/supplies, paying the florist, and working on our reception playlist.
I don’t really have the brains to write much else. But! I wrote something. That’s a start.


